7.23.2007

Needs and Why We Fight

Events of last week of a personal nature have had me thinking about conflict, why we fight, why we get so angry with one another. From the most mundane of silly human squabbles to the most intense, violent, massive-scale all-out wars, I've come to the conclusion that at the core of these situations are unmet needs. And likely, these needs aren't known, or at the very least, we don't know how to express them in the "best" way that will increase our chances of seeing those needs have been met.

Our needs are pretty similar across the board. We have our emotional needs, which include a need to feel appreciated. Respected. Acknowledged. Heard. Loved. We have environmental needs for quiet and safety. Physical needs include clothing, safe shelter, abundant and healthy food and water. And yet despite all of this, we continue to scream at one another, insult one another, especially those with whom we disagree, and often times, with those with whom we love the most.

It's become commonplace to say "wake up" or "you're a blind sheep" and other such phrases towards those with whom we disagree, especially on political and social issues. I'm guilty of it myself for sure. And yet as time passes, a little voice inside of me keeps telling me I can do different, be different. There's a saying that goes something like "when we know better we do better." I prefer to say "when we know different we do different." I mean afterall, isn't "better" just another judgment call? Who says what is better? Maybe there's just different.

So what does this "different" look like? For me, it would be a whole new way of communicating. Last summer I began studying Marshall Rosenberg's (I hope that's his name) method of non-violent communication. It felt weird for sure--almost superficial. But that's how new behavior feels. Unnatural. But when the results produce more peace and love within you, you know you've struck gold.

Like all the rest of the humanoids when trying new behaviors, I fell off the wagon with this method. And I want to get back on. So here goes a new attempt.

I get angry a lot on my blog. And I know I fuel most of it on my own, mostly because I am neglecting to figure out exactly why I am angry and what need of mine isn't being met.

My latests outbursts have been about health care. I am angry there is any resistance towards the idea of a major overhaul of the current system to enable it so that all have access to health care. I am angry with those with whom the system works just fine for them while ignoring (or insulting) those who have an issue with the same. And yet beneath that anger is a voice of pain trying to speak out. And just what exactly is that voice wanting to say? That she needs to feel protected, safe, secure. She needs to feel worthy--as worthy as everyone and anyone else. She needs to be seen and heard. She needs to know she matters. And at a truly idealistic level, she really longs for an environment of peace and love. Love In Action. We're all equal. There is no having to "prove" any of it.

The rest of me is resistant to these needs given how foreign they feel, at least in expressing them. It's much easier to get pissy and angry, even sarcastic, and toss out an insult or two, throw in a few "fucks" and "god damn's". There's the voice that doubts these needs will ever be met, that doubts I'm even worthy of them. But those are fleeting and weak, all based on fear. And lies.

So what do you say fellow bloggers? Can we start communicating in a new way? Next time a post here or elsewhere really pushes your button, dig deep. Maybe that anger is simply about a need that isn't being met. This may not make for interesting reading in terms of our human addiction for the chaotic, the controversial. But if our intention really is about wanting a better world (and maybe at times that isn't what we want--and that's ok--as long as we acknowledge it), a new way of communicating with one another is overdue. What do you think?

5 comments:

tkn said...

i've struggled with the question of striving for a better world, when the term 'better' is so seemingly subjective. however, there is an objective, consensus based definition of the term. show me the person who will deny that slavery was and is evil and needs to be stopped wherever it occurs. show me the person who thinks that the forty hour work week wasn't better than the previous situation (and that a thirty hour work week would be even better for working people). point being, throughout our history, the everyday, ordinary citizens of this country have taken it upon ourselves to change the old, less good ways for ways that are better for everyone.

what i'm really trying to say is that if i trust my conscience and my friends and do my best to be honest with myself, and yet stay open to new ideas and new evidence, i'm reasonably certain that i'll make the right decisions. and that my intuition of 'better' will indeed be better.

As for trying to be more civil, this is another thing i struggle with. but i am trying.

great posts nina

Ranando said...

I'm always civil, don't you think?

This is a good post Nina and a sad post also.

The only thing that can make you feel protected, safe, secure, worthy, and that you matter is yourself, no one can do it for you.

I feel this is one of the reasons you are always so down, your waiting for something to happen or for someone else to do something.

"People don't do things to you, you allow people to do things to you."

Only you can change your World and if you're waiting for some help from the Government or rich people than you are in a horrible place.

Nina said...

no r, you are not always civil. you are as guilty as anyone else of cutting people down, not reading comments thoroughly, mis-reading, etc. etc.

life isn't as black and white as you think it is. of course i know of my responsibilities to create my life. but i also know we need one another. no person is an island. we all need help and opportunities at times.

i find it sad you have somehow misplaced or forgotten that life truth.

allowing people to do things to you is a phrase that places the blame on the victim and serves no purpose. it's simply another black and white way of thinking. i used to chant that same thing as you until i realized there are people who will manipulate, use, control and abuse others and that some people are simply unable due to their belief systems and lack of skills to stand up for themselves. we have a responsibility to look out for one another and to speak out and up for those who don't know how to speak for themselves. afterall, such skills need to be taught and not everyone is taught how (or even allowed) to speak up for themselves.

the example of slavery that tkn describes above is a good one. would you say to such a person you are only allowing people to do that to you? or perhaps would you unite with others to end the abuse--hold the abusers responsible and THEN seek to help these people empower themselves so that the cycle is broken.

when it comes to the government, they do have a responsibility to take care of the people first and foremost and even you have to admit they are doing a horrendous job at that. instead, special interest groups and corporations have taken precedent over the well-being of the people. it's all about money. you're a smart man. you know all of this.

i am sad at times because i am an idealist. i have a vision for how the world can be--a beautiful vision. it is difficult at times to carry this vision--to carry these deep inner knowings and what i can only define as 'truths'. it's a huge responsibility i feel towards the world--i've run from it for years--but i know sharing these ideas is what i am here to do. some days i wish to god i was happy with how the system is. i wish i was happy with how the world is. i wish, for lack of a better world, i were "normal". i am learning to find contentment in the moment, learning how to empower myself through changing life-long thoughts (lies) i've had about who i am--but that inner pull to change the world never goes away. N E V E R. i am a highly sensitive, intuitive person as well. i have a strong sense of fairness and justice for all. and on top of that, many of my values are not values shared by our government and business leaders (by and large) or by your average american citizen, although i know they would be if only presented with other options. i know what my purpose is here--it is to help change these value systems. it's a daunting task--but you cannot run from who you are.

so please don't feel sad for me. listen instead to my ideas. just one or two of them may someday sink in and make some sense. and being you are a very connected individual based largely on the family/circle you were born into, if your heart guides you to, hook me up with someone who would help me further in my goal.

Ranando said...

Nina,

When have I ever been rude to anyone that wasn't rude to me first?

I like your blog and your writings, you know I do or I wouldn't be here. You debate people with what you feel is right and that's good.

It's OK to disagree with each other, you live your life the way you want and I'll live mine the way I want.

I have forwarded some items of yours to some great people, nothing back yet. It will happen, it might take some time.

Your a good person, stay that way.

crallspace said...

***When have I ever been rude to anyone that wasn't rude to me first?***

Ranando, you've done that to me a few times. Like telling me I am "fucked up" for decisions I've made to speak up to someone who pissed me off.