it strikes me as odd, the idea that employers can get away with paying a shitty wage and offering no benefits w/o any pressures from the state, but if someone chooses to smoke, the state wants to penalize them. here in oregon, our governor has a brilliant plan for paying for health care for our children. he wants to impose a new tax on cigarettes.
stupid, stupid, stupid. why doesn't anyone talk about the money already being there? we don't need any new taxes. return the income tax levels of corporations to what they were 20 years ago. if we had a true progressive democratic party, we would be seeing policies that redistribute the wealth. instead, the "blue" party has become one of black and red. black for the wealthy. red for the rest of us. and oregon democrats are supposed to be amongst the most progressive. please........
we all know cigarettes are dangerous. ok, let me restate that. tobacco in and of itself is not that harmful (although of course i am not going to recommend people take up the habit of smoking it). it is the 400+ chemicals that are added that add the greatest threat to our health.
we all have our vices. why is it the democratic party is wanting to tax (yet again) a vice that, according to research, is used by and large by the lowest income earners? if governor kulongoski really wants to create a new tax, let's impose a new tax on, oh say, people who own and operate leer jets. or let's impose a new tax on all vehicles that are worth more than $20,000. or let's increase the personal income tax for people who make more than $150,000 a year or increase the corporate income tax another few percentage points.
yes, this is indeed a sinful situation. it's a sinful situation because it is a sin to ask for more money from a segment of the population who are already struggling. it is time to change our consciousness, our values. it is time to value people--not just in words, but in action. any other progressives out there up to that task?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
No, I don't like it, & I've made myself obnoxiously clear. yes, very left - a bit more than progressive
the term progressive has morphed into something like the following: "yes, i am for equality for all. i am for affordable housing. affordable health care. living wage jobs. oh but wait, you say that means we have to level the playing field some and ask the wealthiest of citizens and business to cough up some more? woops. sorry. my feet don't seem to be able to move in that direction. so let me restate that. i am for equality for all, affordable housing and health care, living wage jobs. but i lack the guts to actually talk about changing the system to create it all."
Post a Comment